Formal Definition
A fiber bundle consists of the data (E, B, π, F), where E, B, and F are topological spaces and π : E → B is a continuous surjection satisfying a local triviality condition outlined below. The space B is called the base space of the bundle, E the total space, and F the fiber. The map π is called the projection map (or bundle projection). We shall assume in what follows that the base space B is connected.
We require that for every x in E, there is an open neighborhood U ⊂ B of π(x) (which will be called a trivializing neighborhood) such that π−1(U) is homeomorphic to the product space U × F, in such a way that π carries over to the projection onto the first factor. That is, the following diagram should commute:
where proj1 : U × F → U is the natural projection and φ : π−1(U) → U × F is a homeomorphism. The set of all {(Ui, φi)} is called a local trivialization of the bundle.
Thus for any p in B, the preimage π−1({p}) is homeomorphic to F (since proj1-1({p}) clearly is) and is called the fiber over p. Every fiber bundle π : E → B is an open map, since projections of products are open maps. Therefore B carries the quotient topology determined by the map π.
A fiber bundle (E, B, π, F) is often denoted
that, in analogy with a short exact sequence, indicates which space is the fiber, total space and base space, as well as the map from total to base space.
A smooth fiber bundle is a fiber bundle in the category of smooth manifolds. That is, E, B, and F are required to be smooth manifolds and all the functions above are required to be smooth maps.
Read more about this topic: Fiber Bundle
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definition:
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)
“Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)